Power, Surveillance, and Resistance in the ESL Classroom: Empirical Insights from the University of Education, D.G. Khan Campus
Abstract
This study uses a Foucauldian approach to examine power relations among BS English students at the University of Education, D.G. Khan Campus. The study looks at how students perceive and experience power and manifest it in their behaviours within the institution. In order to find patterns and statistically significant links in students' perceptions of authority, involvement, autonomy, and institutional control, data were gathered through a structured survey and analysed using SPSS as part of a quantitative research design. The sample is taken from 40 students, and the reliability coefficient of Cronbach’s alpha is 0.858. According to the results, eighty-five per cent of respondents agreed that power operates beyond formal authorities, supporting Foucault’s claim of diffuse, relational power, and supporting Foucault's claim that power is not just imposed from above but rather is ingrained in daily activities. This work closes the gap between critical theory and quantitative methods in higher education research by practically measuring Foucauldian constructs, which are disciplinary rules, surveillance, and power/knowledge. It is important because it adds theoretical depth to Foucauldian studies in the context of Pakistani universities and gives administrators and teachers useful advice on attendance policies, grading rubrics, and classroom monitoring. It also functions as a productive disciplinary mechanism, offering empirical grounds for rethinking student participation frameworks to create more inclusive, reflective, and participatory learning environments.
Keywords
Foucauldian theory, higher education, power dynamics, students, subjectivity
References
- Benesch, S. (1999). Rights Analysis: Studying Power Relations in an Academic Setting. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 18, No. 4, 313–327. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/69826498/s0889-4906_2898_2900011-820210917-20245-13q0hd6-libre.pdf?1631926968=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DRights_Analysis_Studying_Power_Relations.pdf&Expires=1770575794&Signature=DyQG56X6xy-zNg
- Bhattarai, P. (2020). Discourse, Power and Truth: Foucauldian Perspective. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(5). Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/64509330/13IJELS-108202023-Discourse-libre.pdf?1600938628=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DDiscourse_Power_and_Truth_Foucauldian_Pe.pdf&Expires=1770575993&Signature=cJuxxqXZ92NTBGB83rv78pBglAAsHzseXY
- Dumlao, W. T. (2020). Impacts of Positioning, Power, and Resistance on EFL Learners’ Identity Construction through Classroom Interaction: A Perspective from Critical Classroom Discourse Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 25(6). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3513/98047d51eb302fa22746acf7f754426a8111.pdf
- Foucault, M. (1980). POWER/KNOWLEDGE Selected Interviews and Other Writings. United States: The Harvester Press.
- Galal, A. (2017|). The Most Controversial but Undoubtedly Influential: Michel Foucault and His Concept of Power. Journal of humanities and cultures studies R&D, 2.
- Gore, J. M. (1995). On the Continuity of Power Relations in Pedagogy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5:2, 165-188. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0962021950050203
- Lukes, S. (2021). Power: A Radical View. London: Red Globe Press.
- Mukhlis, M. M. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. van Dijk pada surat kabar online dengan tajuk kilas balik pembelajaran jarak jauh akibat pandemi Covid-19. Geram (Gerakan Aktif Menulis), 73-85.
- Orungbeja, B. &. (2022). National speeches by notable political figures: A position paper on CDA studies. ESI Preprints, 7, 168-168. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.7.2022.p168
- Rojo, L. M. (2022). Power and the role of language. Handbook of Pragmatics Online 25, 107-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.25.pow1