Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind, peer-reviewed, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Research Articles

Monetary Sovereignty and Digital Currency Governance: A Comparative Legal Analysis of China’s e-CNY and Pakistan’s Virtual Asset Framework

Published 17-06-2026

  • Imtiaz Ali
    • ,
  • Saliha Khalid Sair
    • ,
  • Srikanto Mondal

Imtiaz Ali
Master of Laws Scholar, School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Yubei, Chongqing, China

Saliha Khalid Sair
Master of Laws Scholar, Law, School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Yubei, Chongqing, China

Srikanto Mondal
PhD Scholar, Law, School of International Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Yubei, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Background. The emergence of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and privately issued virtual assets has challenged established assumptions about monetary sovereignty, financial regulation, and cross-border value transfer, particularly across the Global South.

Research problem. Existing scholarship tends to examine sovereign CBDCs and private crypto-assets in isolation, leaving the legal consequences of divergent national strategies insufficiently theorised.

Objectives. This article compares the legal architecture of China’s Digital Yuan (e-CNY) with Pakistan’s evolving virtual-asset regime to establish how each reconciles monetary sovereignty, financial stability, and innovation, and to draw lessons for emerging economies.

Methodology. The study adopts a qualitative, doctrinal, and functional-comparative design, drawing on primary legislation, regulatory instruments, and authoritative international standards, organised through an explicit analytical framework.

Key findings. China operationalises a centralised, sovereignty-driven CBDC embedded in existing monetary law, whereas Pakistan has moved, through the Virtual Assets Ordinance 2025 and the Virtual Assets Act 2026, from prohibition toward a statutory, risk-based licensing regime, while institutional capacity remains the binding constraint.

Policy implications. Regulatory effectiveness depends less on convergence with international norms than on statutory clarity, institutional coordination, and sequenced implementation. These findings are benchmarked against India, Singapore, and the European Union.

Keywords

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), virtual asset regulation, monetary sovereignty, comparative financial law, e-CNY, Pakistan

PDF

References

  1. Agur, I., Ari, A., & Dell’Ariccia, G. (2022). Designing central bank digital currencies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 125, 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.05.002
  2. Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 (Pakistan).
  3. Atlantic Council. (2025). Central bank digital currency tracker. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/
  4. Atlantic Council. (2026). What to watch as China prepares its digital yuan for prime time. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/what-to-watch-as-china-prepares-its-digital-yuan-for-prime-time/
  5. Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2020). Rise of the central bank digital currencies: Drivers, approaches and technologies (BIS Working Paper No. 880). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work880.htm
  6. Auer, R., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Monnet, C., Rice, T., & Shin, H. S. (2022). Central bank digital currencies: Motives, economic implications, and the research frontier. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 697-721. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-020324
  7. Auer, R., Haene, P., & Holden, H. (2021). Multi-CBDC arrangements and the future of cross-border payments (BIS Papers No. 115). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap115.htm
  8. Bank for International Settlements. (2023). Project Bridge: Connecting economies through CBDC. BIS Innovation Hub.
  9. Bast, C. M., & Hawkins, M. (2013). Foundations of legal research and writing (5th ed.). Delmar Cengage Learning.
  10. Boar, C., Holden, H., & Wadsworth, A. (2020). Impending arrival: A sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency (BIS Papers No. 107). Bank for International Settlements.
  11. Bossu, W., Itatani, M., Margulis, C., Rossi, A., Weenink, H., & Yoshinaga, A. (2020). Legal aspects of central bank digital currency: Central bank and monetary law considerations (IMF Working Paper No. WP/20/254). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561622.001
  12. Brooks, S. (2021). Revisiting the monetary sovereignty rationale for CBDCs (Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper No. 2021-17). Bank of Canada.
  13. Bu, X., & Ma, Q. (2022). Cross-border flow of e-CNY: Motives, challenges, and institutional responses. Research on Rule of Law, 1, 91-101.
  14. European Central Bank. (2025, October 30). Eurosystem moving to next phase of digital euro project [Press release]. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2025/html/ecb.pr251030~8c5b5beef0.en.html
  15. Financial Action Task Force. (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org
  16. Financial Stability Board. (2023). High-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements. Financial Stability Board.
  17. Group of Central Banks. (2020). Central bank digital currencies: Foundational principles and core features (Joint report). Bank for International Settlements.
  18. Hu, P. Z. (2022). Decoding the rise of central bank digital currency in China. Frontiers in Blockchain, 5, 1-8.
  19. Huo, X. (2021). China’s approach to central bank digital currency: Selectively reshaping the international financial order? University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review, 18, 84-93.
  20. IMF-FSB. (2023). IMF-FSB synthesis paper: Policies for crypto-assets. Financial Stability Board.
  21. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Central bank digital currency adoption: Inclusion strategies and considerations (Fintech Note No. 2024/005). International Monetary Fund.
  22. Jiang, J. (2023a). Background and implications of China’s e-CNY [Working paper]. University of Florida, Fredric G. Levin College of Law.
  23. Jiang, J. (2023b). Privacy implications of central bank digital currencies. Seton Hall Law Review, 54, 69.
  24. Khan, M. A., & Khan, A. (2023). The legal and regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and digital assets in Pakistan. UCP Journal of Law and Legal Education, 1, 5-15.
  25. Khan, M. A., & Khan, A. (2024). Acceptance of central bank digital currency in Pakistan: An empirical investigation [Working paper]. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com
  26. Kiff, J., Alwazir, J., Davidovic, S., Farias, A., Khan, A., Khiaonarong, T., Malaika, M., Monroe, H. K., Sugimoto, N., Tourpe, H., & Zhou, P. (2020). A survey of research on retail central bank digital currency (IMF Working Paper No. 2020/104). International Monetary Fund.
  27. Koziuk, V. (2024). Digitalization and the CBDC trilemma. Economic Journal of Emerging Economies, 6, 52-56.
  28. Liao, G. Y., & Carstens, A. (2022). Central bank digital currencies and fast payment systems (BIS Papers No. 151). Bank for International Settlements.
  29. Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA).
  30. Mohammad Umar Farooq v. State Bank of Pakistan (Sindh High Court, Pakistan, 2020) (unreported).
  31. Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2023, August 15). MAS finalises stablecoin regulatory framework [Media release]. https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2023/mas-finalises-stablecoin-regulatory-framework
  32. People’s Bank of China. (2025). e-CNY International Operation Center officially launched in Shanghai [Press release]. https://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688110/3688172/5552468/5855057/index.html
  33. Prasad, E. (2021). The future of money: How the digital revolution is transforming currencies and finance. Harvard University Press.
  34. Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016 (Pakistan).
  35. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Digital Rupee (e₹) pilot: Wholesale and retail segments. Reserve Bank of India.
  36. Ringe, K., & Pietruszka, R. H. (2025). A systematisation of legal-regulatory risks related to central bank digital currencies. Journal of Banking Regulation. Advance online publication.
  37. Samuel, G. (2020). Comparative method of legal research: Nature, process, and methods. In C. E. P. M. Brölmann, J. Klabbers, & W. Werner (Eds.), Methods of comparative law (pp. 35-39). Oxford University Press.
  38. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. (2020). Position paper: Regulation of digital asset trading platforms. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan.
  39. State Bank of Pakistan. (2018). Prohibition of dealing in virtual currencies/tokens (BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018, April 6, 2018). State Bank of Pakistan.
  40. State Bank of Pakistan. (2022). Guidelines for the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing relating to virtual assets. State Bank of Pakistan.
  41. Twining, W. (1999). Globalisation and comparative law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 6(3), 217-243.
  42. Twining, W. (2009). General jurisprudence: Understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  43. Virtual Assets Act 2026 (Pakistan).
  44. Virtual Assets Ordinance 2025 (Pakistan).
  45. Watkins, D., & Burton, M. (Eds.). (2018). Research methods in law (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  46. Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). Decentralized finance (DeFi). Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172-188.
  47. Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.