Linguistic Variation Across Pakistani Male and Female Writers of Short Stories in English: A Multidimensional Analysis
![](https://jar.bwo-researches.com/public/journals/1/cover_issue_10_en_US.jpg)
Abstract
The current study inspects some distinguished discourse features in the corpus of short stories in English by Pakistani male and female writers. This study highlights both the functional use of language and linguistic variations in English short stories of Pakistani male and female writers. This study analyzes the linguistic features adopted by Pakistani male and female writers of short stories in English and inspects how far both genders are different from one another in the functional use of language. The quantitative research method was used in this research. These features are analyzed through a Multidimensional analysis tool. This tool contains elaborate linguistic features. The purposive corpus of 68 stories has been organized for this research to analyze and extract specific linguistic features. A multidimensional tool (MAT v 1.3.2) is used to analyze and tag the data on Bibber’s (1988) five functional dimensions. These dimensions indicate the density of information, narrative characteristics, the explicitness of text, degree of persuasion, and abstract information. Moreover, the comparison indicates that male discourse is highly dense with information as compared to female discourse. While, on the other hand, female texts indicate more non-abstract information as compared to male texts. Therefore, it can be concluded that linguistic variation exists between Pakistani male and female writers of short stories in English. Other short stories may be examined in future research. This might help obtain more precise findings. The future researcher would gather data from various sources that achieve more precise results.
Keywords
Dimensions, Gender, Linguistic variation, multidimensional analysis, Pakistani writer, short stories
References
- Alkhalaf, S. (2019). Women and Men in Writing Science Fiction Short Stories. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(6), 126-131.
- Alvi, U. F. et al., (2016). Linguistic variation across gender in Pakistani print media: A
- Multidimensional analysis. Sci. Int. (Lahore), 28, 403-407.
- Bamman, D. et al., (2014). Gender identity and lexical variation in social media‟, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2): 135-160
- Bibber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press Bibber, D. (2009). Multidimensional approaches. In Luling & M.Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistic: An International Handbook Vol 2, pp. 822-825. Berlin: Walter de Gruter. bibber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentially and affect. Text-interdisciplinary journal for the study of discourse, 9(1), 93-124
- Johannsen, A. et al., (2015) Cross-lingual syntactic variation over age and gender. In Proceedings of the 19th conference on computational language learning, pages 103112, Beijing. China, July 30, 31, 2015. Association for computational linguistics.
- Karlsson, S. (2007) Gender-related differences in language use. a master‟ s thesis, University of Technology, Department of language and culture.
- Li, J., Ritter, A., & Hovy, E. (2014). Weakly supervised user profile extraction from Twitter. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 165-174).
- Nemati, A & Bayer, J. M. (2007) Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: a comparative study of Persian and English. Retrieved on February 6, 2016. From http:// salr.net/Documents/Azadeh Bayer 2007.pdf
- Newman. Et al., (2008) Gender differences in language use: an analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45: 211-246
- R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual conference of the cognitive science society, Biological versus Sociological theories (pp.1009- 1013
- Xia, X. (2013) Gender differences in using language theory & practice in language studies, 3(8) 1485 DOI: 10.4304/tpls.3.8.1485-1489