Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Freedom of Information VS Right to Privacy: Cyber Stalking-a Legal Perspective

Abstract

Cyber Stalking is the intimidation or menace to cause distress by blackmailing through the internet and it is a threat to the right of privacy while abusing freedom of information. Cyberstalking is an offense that is exclusively considered a violation of the right to freedom of information. The legislative history ranging from the mandate provided in the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 and by the time-to-time enactment helps to investigate and prove that the concept of limitation on freedom of information is not new. Article 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan gives the grounds on which the state can impose restrictions such as in the interest of the glory or integrity of Islam, security of Pakistan, public order, decency, morality, or incitement to an offence. Moreover, cyberstalking given under section 24 of the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act 2016 (PECA) provides penalties including detainment and fines. The research is descriptive, as the theoretical framework used to study the concept of cyber stalking law adoption, with special reference to the case laws, is studied with the legislative history. An analytical and critical approach is taken when issues concerning the restriction on freedom of information are discussed providing Pakistan's legal perspective on cyberstalking. Historically, in Pakistan, freedom of information has never been absolute. Thus, criticism drawn over recently promulgated social media rules found no legal ground in the existing legal framework, and it is high time that more emphasis is laid on critically evaluating historical legal aspects before censuring newly promulgated laws.

Keywords

Cyber Stalking, Internet, Freedom of Information, Legislative History, Precedential History

PDF

References

  1. Alam, M. A. (2015). Right to Information and Media Laws in Pakistan Islamabad: Centre for Peace and Development Initiatives (CPDI), 1-18.
  2. Begum Zeb-un-Nisa v. Pakistan, PLD 1958 SC 35.
  3. Citron, D. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.023.
  5. Functions. (n.d.). Pakistan Telecommunication Authority. https://www.pta.gov.pk/en/functions Ghulam Sarwar Awan v. Government of Sindh, PLD 1988 Kar. 414.
  6. Jameson, S. (2008) Cyberharrasment: Striking a balance between free speech and privacy CommLaw Conspectus, 17, 231.
  7. Lapshin, I. Y., and Klimakov, A. V. (2019, July). Cyberbullying and cyberstalking as a moral and legal concept in the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences, and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) (pp. 1857–1861). Atlantis Press.
  8. Munir, A., & Shabir, G. (2018) Social Media and Cyber Crimes in Pakistan: Facts, Propaganda, Awareness, and Legislation Global Political Review (GPR), 3(2), 84–97.
  9. Pakistan (1973). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
  10. Pakistan Telecommunication Act (1996). Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance (2007).
  11. Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act, Section 24 (2016). Removal and blocking of unlawful online content (procedure, oversight, and safeguards) rules (2021)
  12. Shambhavee, H. M. (2019). Cyber-Stalking: Threat to People or Bane to Technology, International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 3(2), 350-355.
  13. Thapa, A. &. (2011). Cyberstalking: crime and challenge in the cyberspace. International Journal of Engineering Sciences, 4(2), 340-354.
  14. The State v. Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, 1990 CLC 1500.
  15. Thelwall, M. (2002). Research dissemination and invocation on the web. Online Information Review 26(6), 413–420.
  16. The Press Council Ordinance, Section 8 (1)(i) (2002).
  17. The Telegraph Act, Section 20 (1885).
  18. The Defamation Ordinance, Section 6 (2002).
  19. Unichem Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd. and Others v. Abdullah Ismail and Others, 1992 MLD 2375