Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Investigating Gender Perceptions on Technology Use in Pakistan ELT Classrooms: A Survey-Based Study

Abstract

Students' motivation is increased when they use the internet. The importance of information and communication technology in course books has evolved in all educational fields to move towards modern methods of teaching. This research was based on inspecting the perception of males and females concerning the use of technology in English language teaching classrooms by utilizing quantitative research procedures.  The perception of gender towards the utilization of technology in ELT classrooms was explored through a questionnaire. The survey was administered on the accessibility and readiness of the contributors. The sample size (N=90) comprises English Language students from various classes at the University of Okara (Department of English Language). The results of the study revealed that females have greater knowledge of English language learning and technological integration in ELT due to variations in these values and also females have a larger tendency to favour the use of technology in ELT classes than males. The findings elucidated that technology has profoundly shaped our societal fabric, exerting distinct permutations upon our collective ethos and cognitive paradigms. By taking into account any potential gender-based prejudices or barriers, educators may create a more thorough and beneficial learning environment that motivates all students to actively engage with technology.

Keywords

Gender Perceptions, Societal Impact, Teaching Strategies, English Language Learning, Technology, Integration

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2017). Authentic ELT Materials in the Language Classroom : An Overview. 4(2), 181–202.
  2. Batool, R.(2023). Exploring Gender Perceptions on Using Technology in ELT Classrooms: A Survey-based Study. Unpublished M Phil Thesis. GC University Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  3. Cakir, R. (2012). TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP IN. 11(4), 273–282.
  4. Chvala, L. (2020). Teacher ideologies of English in 21st century Norway and new directions for locally tailored ELT. System, 94, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102327
  5. Climate change a major threat to global health — WHO - Asia & Pacific. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2022, from https://www.scidev.net/asia-pacific/news/climate-change-a-major-threat-to-global-health-who/
  6. Education, F. L. (2018). Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 3(1), 2018. 3(1), 0–2.
  7. Ejaz, H., & Naz, S. (2022). The Impact of Task-Based Language Teaching on Learning English Grammar at Secondary School Level. 10(4), 88–99.
  8. Ekstrand, L. H. (1980). Sex differences in second language learning? Empirical studies and a discussion of related findings. Applied Psychology, 29(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1980.tb00891.x
  9. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive Gender Differences Are Disappearing. American Psychologist, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95
  10. Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2021). This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in ELT JOURNAL The definitive publisher-authenticated version can be found at Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom. 72(February), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx010
  11. Grebennikov, L., & Skaines, I. (2009). Gender and higher education experience : a case study. 28(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444370
  12. Guzman, A., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00322.x
  13. Hauer, P. T. (2017). Technological determinism and new media. 2, 1–4.
  14. Hismano, M. (2011). The integration of information and communication technology into current ELT coursebooks : a critical analysis. 15, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.048
  15. Hixon, E., & Buckenmeyer, J. (2009). Revisiting Technology Integration in Schools : Implications for Professional Development Revisiting Technology Integration in Schools : Implications for Professional Development. 0569. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560902906070
  16. Hockly, N., Consultants-e, T., & Dudeney, G. (2018a). Current and Future Digital Trends in ELT Current and Future Digital Trends in ELT. October. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218777318
  17. Ibrahim, A. I. (2010). Information & Communication Technologies in ELT. 1(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.211-214
  18. Info, A. (2022). Technology integration in teaching English as a foreign language : A content analysis study.
  19. Iqbal, M., & Rafi, M. S. (2018). A Comparative Study of English Language Teaching Practices at the Access Program and Public Schools. 40(3), 231–249.
  20. Katemba, C. V. (2019). Teachers ’ Perceptions in Implementing Technologies in Language Teaching and Learning. katemba, 38–52.
  21. Koerner, E. F. K. (1992). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: A Preliminary History and a Bibliographical Essay. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.173
  22. Language, E., & Program, T. (2014). USE OF ICT TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORS AFFECTING PRE-SERVICE ELT TEACHERS ’ PERCEIVED ICT SELF-EFFICACY. 13(2).
  23. Lubis, N., Lubis, A., & Ashadi, R. I. (2018). Integrating Teaching Models to Enhance Efl Students ’ Interpersonal Communication Skill and Creativity. 2012.
  24. Manegre, M., Sabiri, K. A. (2020). Online language learning using virtual classrooms : an analysis of teacher perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770290
  25. Mccaughan, P. M. (2009). An Historical Look at Gender in the ESL Classroom. 80–84.
  26. Nawaila, M. B. (2020). Technology and English Language Teaching and Learning : A Content Analysis. 5(1), 16–23.
  27. Negi, J. S. (2009). The Role of Teachers ’ Non-verbal Communication in ELT Classroom. 1(1), 101–110.
  28. Nuraeni, C., Bina, U., Informatika, S., & Barat, J. (2019). Using Total Physical Response ( TPR ) Method on Young Learners English Language Teaching. 3(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.
  29. Pellegrino, J. W., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2014). Perspectives on the Integration of Technology and Assessment. 1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782565
  30. Phillipson, R. (2001). OF AND THE Ideology and the ELT practitioner.
  31. Pu, H. (2020). Implementing online ELT in the time of crisis : ordeal or opportunity ? 74(July), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa030
  32. Rao, B. M. (2014). Use of media as an instructional tool in English Language Teaching ( ELT ) at undergraduate level. 5(6), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL2014.0580
  33. Review, A. E. (2014). The challenge of effective technology integration into teaching and learning. 6627. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.853559
  34. Rochma, A. F., & Triastuti, A. (2020). Rhetorical styles of Introduction in English language teaching ( ELT ) research articles. 10(2), 304–314.
  35. Sabiri, M. S., & Shah, M. I. (2023). Vocabulary and Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL): A Survey on ESL Undergraduate Learners of Punjab. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 4(2), 187–200.
  36. Sansinadi, I. T., & Yogyakarta, A. D. (2020). TEACHER S PERSPECTIVES TOWARD GOOGLE CLASSROOM AS A TOOL FOR IMPROVING ELT CLASSROOM INTERACTION. 7(2), 370–381.
  37. Shen, C. (2003). Using English Songs : an Enjoyable and Effective Approach to ELT. 2(1), 88–94.
  38. Singh, R. (2019). Students ’ perspectives on technology integration in ELT. 24(1).
  39. Studies, L. (2018a). JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES An investigation of prospective ELT teachers ’ attitudes towards using computer technologies in foreign language teaching. 14(1), 328–341.
  40. Studies, L., Demir, Y., & Yavuz, M. (2017). JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES Do ELT coursebooks still suffer from gender inequalities ? A case study from Turkey. 13(1), 103–122.
  41. Tin, T. B. (2013). Towards creativity in ELT : the need to say something new. 67(October), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct022
  42. Tosuncuoglu, I. (2018). Importance of Assessment in ELT. 6(9), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3443
  43. Training, T., Surabaya, U. M., Java, E., Malang, U. N., & Java, E. (2020). TEACHERS ’ ICT LITERACY AND ICT INTEGRATION IN ELT. July, 0–3.
  44. Wongsothorn, A., Hiranburana, K., & Chinnawongs, S. (2006). English Language Teaching in Thailand Today English Language Teaching in Thailand Today. 8791(2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220210
  45. Zhang, X. (n.d.). Re-conceptualizing Techno-Linguistics : Using Technology for English Language Teaching ? Technology-Based English Language Teaching. 162–166.
  46. Zheng, S. (2012). Studies and Suggestions on English Vocabulary Teaching and Learning. 5(5), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n5p129