Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Challenges to the Parliament in Pakistan and the Rise of Secessionist Movements

Abstract

  The purpose of this study is to identify challenges to the Parliament of Pakistan and how it paves the way for the secessionist movements in Pakistan. This article relies on secondary sources of data, such as books, articles, newspapers, and national archives, to review and interpret the secondary data. While the study argues that the constitution-making process in Pakistan resembled a game of musical chairs, involving the people, the ruling elite, and federating units, unfortunately, the winners consistently turned out to be the military-backed nexus of bureaucracy and the landed elite. This paper observes that the power struggle escalated to the extent that it took a toll on the vitality of the nation. Various experiments were conducted in the composition of the parliament to appease the interests of specific provinces, ultimately shaping the current parliament as a reflection of historical dominance by institutions, particularly those favouring a single province. Therefore, this paper proposes that the lower house of the current parliament, the National Assembly, should adopt a "parity formula" aimed at addressing the demands of smaller provinces. In this way, Pakistan may return to its genuine form while historical imbalances could be removed, resulting in a more inclusive political landscape.

Keywords

Ethnicity, , Diversity, , Parity parliament, , Powers of the Senate

PDF

References

  1. Alexander, P. C. (1947). The cabinet mission's scheme and division of powers: The Problem of a Weak Centre and Strong Units. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 736-741.
  2. Bernauer, J., Giger, N., & Rosset, J. (2015). Mind the gap: Do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?. International Political Science Review, 36(1), 78-98.
  3. Bulmer, W. E. (2020). Parliament I: Functions, Powers and Composition. In Westminster and the World (pp. 135-176). Bristol University Press.
  4. Gastil, J., & Wright, E. O. (2018). Legislature by lot: Envisioning sortition within a bicameral system. Politics & Society, 46(3), 303-330.
  5. Greene, J. P. (2014). The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689-1776. UNC Press Books.
  6. Hanson, A. H. (2022). The purpose of parliament. In Planning and the Politicians (pp. 11-28). Routledge.
  7. https://www.brecorder.com/news/40276582/national-assembly-seats-reduced-by-six, Zulfiqar Ahmad December 4, 2023
  8. Jalal, A. (2014). The struggle for Pakistan: A Muslim homeland and global politics. Harvard University Press.
  9. Johnston, R., Pattie, C., & Rossiter, D. (2015). Ensuring equal representation in Parliament: who counts?. British Politics and Policy at LSE.
  10. Khanam, A., Khan, A. R., & Dasti, H. A. (2019). Jinnah’s Principles of Government. Journal of Pakistan Vision, 20(1).
  11. Khurshid Ahmad Khan Yusufi, Speeches, Statements & Messages of the Quaid-i-Azam, Vol. IV, 1946-1948, Bazm-E-Iqbal, Lahore, P, 2563
  12. Kukreja, V. (2020). Ethnic diversity, political aspirations and state response: A case study of Pakistan. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 28-42.
  13. Lee, F. E., & Oppenheimer, B. I. (1999). Sizing up the Senate: The unequal consequences of equal representation. University of Chicago Press.
  14. Military. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 38(2), 44-64.
  15. Mushtaq, M. (2009). Managing ethnic diversity and federalism in Pakistan. European Journal of Scientific Research, 33(2/0), 279–294
  16. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2001). Cultural obstacles to equal representation. J. Democracy, 12, 126.
  17. Rozenberg, O. (2020). On the concepts of parliament, parliamentarianism and parliamentary democracy. In Handbook of Parliamentary Studies (pp. 14-31). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Russell, M. (2001). The territorial role of second chambers. Journal of Legislative Studies, 7(1), 105-118.
  19. Saliu, H. A., & Muhammad, A. A. (2009). Exploring the parliament. Afr. J. Int'l Aff. & Dev., 14, 140.
  20. Wolf‐Phillips, L. (1979). Constitutional legitimacy: A study of the doctrine of necessity. Third World Quarterly, 1(4), 97-133.