Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Research Articles

Affective Learning: Exploring Teacher Education Programme Syllabi Alignment with Classroom Practice

Published 20-04-2024

  • Ms. Mussarat Shahid
    • ,
  • Dr. Afifa Khanam

Ms. Mussarat Shahid
Lahore College for Women University, Lahore

Dr. Afifa Khanam
Lahore College for Women University, Lahore

Abstract

  Teacher education is a cornerstone of every education system, serving as a barometer for programme philosophy and quality. This paper delves into the alignment between preservice TE syllabi and classroom practice within Pakistan’s public sector, specific focus on integrating affective skills as outlined in the NPST disposition framework. Through a multimodal approach, this study conducts document analysis and observes teaching methods to gauge the extent to which affected dispositions are fostered. The significance of the affective domain, encompassing emotional and psychosocial aspects of learning, is underscored in this research. Subject selection across semesters is carefully curated values, attitudes, and beliefs essential for effective teaching and learning. The seven selected subjects include Foundations of Reading, Reading Assessment, Teaching Reading, Education Psychology, Classroom Management, Contemporary Issues and Trends in Education, and School Organization. By examining syllabi from 2019-2022, this study aims to ascertain the degree to which affective skills are integrated into the curriculum and manifested in classroom practices. Through detailed document analysis and observation of teaching practices, researchers seek to illuminate the presence of the affective domain in the education system. This study’s findings hold implications for improving TE programmes and fostering a student-centred approach to teaching and learning. Recommendations stemming from the analysis aim to enhance the implementation of syllabi, ensuring they reflect the values and attitudes conducive to holistic learning experiences. By highlighting the importance of effective skills in teacher preparation, it seeks to promote a more comprehensive approach to education that addresses the diverse needs of learners.

Keywords

Preservice, , Public, , Affective, , Holistic, , NPST

PDF

Author Biography

Ms. Mussarat Shahid

 

PhD Scholar- Assistant Professor: Mussarat Shahid has had a long stint as a School Leader, a Teacher Trainer and an English Language Teacher. Ms. Shahid joined the Forman Christian College as Head of the Writing & Communication Center and Assistant Professor in 2019 upon successfully completing an MPhil in educational leadership and school improvement from the University of Cambridge.

Dr. Afifa Khanam

Dr. Afifa Khanam is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Education, Lahore College for Women University. She is heading the Faculty Development Center at DFDI, LCWU. She is the Convener of the Alumni Association LCWU and a PhD Coordinator at the Faculty of Education.

References

  1. Akhter, N. (2013). An investigation of Pakistani university teacher-educators’ and student-teachers’ perceptions of the role and importance of inquiry-based pedagogy in their professional learning experiences in initial teacher education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow.
  2. Atherton, C. (2005). Defining literary criticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206.
  4. Bacchus, M. K. (1996). The Role of Teacher Education in Development in South Countries. Alberta journal of educational research, 42(2), 77-86.
  5. Beard, C., Clegg, S., & Smith, K. (2007). Acknowledging affective in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 235-252.
  6. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
  7. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 31(4), 399-413.
  8. Brett, A., Smith, M., Price, E., & Huitt, W. (2003). Overview of affective domain. Educational Psychology Interactive, 1-21.
  9. Burgstahler, S., & Cory, R. (2008). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  10. Carlson, J. (2006). An examination of undergraduate student citation behaviour. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 14-22.
  11. Clark, G. (2005). Reform in higher education in Pakistan. Education reform in Pakistan: Building for the future. Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars: Washington, DC.
  12. Cooper, H. M., & Tom, D. Y. (1984). Teacher expectation research: A review with implications for classroom instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 77-89.
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). No Child Left Behind and high school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 642-667.
  14. Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational psychologist, 38(4), 207-234.
  15. Denzin, N. K. (2017). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. Routledge.
  16. Doyle, T., & Zakrajsek, T. D. (2018). The new science of learning: How to learn in harmony with your brain. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  17. Fraser, C. J. (2007). Secondary school girls in conversation about school success: implications for practice and policy (Doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia.
  18. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher education and educational change. Teacher education and educational change, 1-9.
  19. Hoodbhoy, P. (1998). Education and the state: Fifty years of Pakistan. (No Title).
  20. Hubbart, J. A. (2023). Organizational change: The challenge of change aversion. Administrative Sciences, 13(7), 162.
  21. Iscan, C. D., & Senemoglu, N. (2009). Effectiveness of values education curriculum for fourth grades. Egitim Ve Bilim, 34(153), 1.
  22. Izadinia, M. (2012). Teacher Educators as Role Models: A Qualitative Examination of Student Teacher’s and Teacher Educator’s Views towards Their Roles. Qualitative Report, 17, 47.
  23. Khalid, H. S. (1996). Female teachers’ and girls’ access to primary schools in rural areas of Pakistan: a case study (Doctoral dissertation). Institute of Education, University of London.
  24. Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Experimental design in educational research.
  25. Lockheed, L. (1993). What do we know about school effectiveness and school improvement. World Bank.
  26. Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in Pakistan: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of management and social sciences, 3(1), 47-55.
  27. Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 25-35.
  28. Misra, P. K. (2015). Teacher education policies, practices, and reform in Scotland: Implications in the Indian context. Cogent education, 2(1), 1066089.
  29. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
  30. Paul, P. (2003). Processes and components of reading. Handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 97-109.
  31. Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. Sage.
  32. Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 47-51.
  33. Rowntree, D. (1981). A Dictionary of Education. Harper & Row Pub.
  34. Stiegelbauer, S. (1992). Why We Want To Be Teachers: New Teachers Talk about Their Reasons for Entering the Profession.
  35. Tahira, M., Hassan, A., Malik, A., & Yousuf, M. I. (2020). Teacher Education in Pakistan: Issues and Problems. Online Submission.
  36. Yang, M. (2006). A critical review of research on questioning in education: limitations of its positivistic basis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03031543
  37. Young, J. C. (1997). National Standards for Physical Education. ERIC Digest.
  38. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
  39. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encourage self regulated learning in the classroom.