Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Critical Discourse Analysis of Marketization of Higher Education on University Websites in Pakistan

Abstract

  This study explores the marketization of higher education on university websites in Pakistan by drawing on critical discourse analysis. The process through which educational institutions have adopted market-oriented techniques as part of the competition in a neoliberal order is called ‘marketization’. This research aims to investigate the linguistic features and discursive strategies employed on Pakistani university websites to depict the marketization of higher education. Using a qualitative research design within the tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis, the textual content of university websites was examined in this research. The research discovers several prominent linguistic features such as testimonials, positive framing, persuasive language, and an emphasis on employability and professional success. It also provides insights into the possible ramifications of marketization of the sector on the autonomy and values of universities, as well as on the process through which students make choices about their education and their experiences of it. The implications of our findings stress the importance of engaging critically with the processes of marketization taking place in higher education and urging universities and higher education systems to find a point of equilibrium between their market-oriented strategies on one hand and their fundamental educational purpose, on the other.

Keywords

Marketization, , Testimonials, , Persuasive, , Discourse, , Linguistic.

PDF

References

  1. Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres—the international student prospectus is a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082576
  2. Amjad, T., & Shakir, A. (2014). Study of information generating linguistic features in online university prospectuses. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(25), 122-128.
  3. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133-168.
  4. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse the universities. In Critical discourse analysis (pp. 91-125). Routledge.
  5. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669176
  6. Kwong, J. (2000). Introduction: Marketization and privatization in education. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 87-92.
  7. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher education, 43, 281-309.
  8. Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre perspective. Discourse & Communication, 2(1), 57-77.
  9. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Teo, P. (2007). The marketization of higher education: A comparative case study of two universities in Singapore. Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines, 1(1), 95-111.
  11. Urciuoli, B. (2003). Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education. Language & Communication, 23(3-4), 385-408.
  12. Zollo, A. S. (2016). Internationalization and globalization: A multimodal analysis of Italian universities’ websites. Journal of Multimodal Communication Studies, 3(1-2), 1-17.