Teaching world Englishes in the postcolonial world: A case study of Pakistan

Abstract
This paper addresses the global challenges of teaching World Englishes in the postcolonial context, focusing on the marginalization of local languages due to the dominant influence of English in Pakistan. The paper explores practical strategies for teaching English critically within the Pakistani classroom. English language educators can enhance their teaching by integrating critical thinking and incorporating local languages and cultural concepts into the prescribed curriculum. Utilizing an action research methodology, the three researchers collaborated on their classroom activities and proposed recommendations for implementing critical pedagogy in English language instruction. This pedagogical framework aims to empower English language teachers to promote discussions that incorporate elements from vernacular languages within their English language classrooms.
Keywords
English Language Teaching, World Englishes, Critical Pedagogy, Pakistani Classroom
References
- Álvarez, Z.; Calvete, M. y Sarasa, M.C. (2012). Integrating Critical Pedagogy theory and practice: Classroom experiences in Argentinean EFL teacher education. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, Vol. 3, pp. 60 – 70.
- Benesch, S. (1999). Thinking critically, thinking dialogically. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 573-580.
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.
- Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A study of its development (Vol. 34). Multilingual Matters.
- Canagarajah, A. S. (1993). American textbooks and Tamil students: Discerning ideological tensions in the ESL classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 6(2), 143-156.
- Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Critical pedagogy in L2 learning and teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 931-949). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Caroe, O. (1964). The Pathans 550 B.C. - A.D. 1957. London: Macmillan & Co Ltd.
- Fairclough, N. (1993). Language and Power, New York: Longman.
- Fishman, J. A., & García, O. (2010). Handbook of language and ethnic identity (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press, USA.
- Foucault, M. (1972). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, (ISBN 039473954 www.librarything.com/work/3549
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press. (1974) Education for Critical consciousness, Crossroad Publishing Company.
- Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Kachru, B. B. (2006). The English language in the outer circle. World Englishes, 3, 241-255.
- Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2002). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of education, 87-138.
- Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Towards a Postmethod Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 537-560.
- Mahboob, A. (2003). The future of English in Pakistan. Islamabad: Strengthening Participatory Organization.
- Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2015). Disjunction between language policy and children's sociocultural ecology–an analysis of English-medium education policy in Pakistan. Language and Education, 29(5), 453-473.
- Meyer, M. (1991). 10 Developing Transcultural Competence: Case Studies of Advanced Foreign Language Learners. Mediating languages and cultures: Towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education, 60, 136.
- McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives. NY: OUP.
- McKay, S., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (2008). International English in its sociolinguistic contexts: Towards a socially sensitive EIL pedagogy. New York: Routledge
- Moll, L. C., & González, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language-minority children. Journal of Reading Behaviour.
- Schwarz, & Ray (Eds.). (2005). A companion to postcolonial studies. Malden, USA- Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical Approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329-348.
- Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1986). Linguicism rules in education. Roskilde University Centre, Institute VI.
- Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-why?. TESOL Quarterly, 161-176.
- Rahman, T. (1997). The medium of instruction controversy in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(2), 145-154.
- Rahman, T. (2001). Language-learning and power: A theoretical approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 53-74.
- Rahman, T. (2001). English-teaching institutions in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(3), 242-261.
- Rahman,T.(2003). Language-Teaching and Power' Indian Social Science Review 5:1(2003), 45- 6).
- Rajagopalan, K. (2004). The concept of ‘World English’ and its implications for ELT. ELT journal, 58(2), 111-117.
- Schmidt, P. R. (1999). Focus on research: Know thyself and understand others. Language Arts, 76(4), 332-340.
- Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249.
- Simpson, A. (Ed.). (2007). Language and national identity in Asia. OUP Oxford 100-115.
- Spindler, G. D. (1987). Education and cultural process: Anthropological approaches. Waveland Press.