Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Analyzing Cultural Hegemony Via Power Ambition Among Social Structures : in Latin American Novel

Abstract

The human experience with power ambition is rarely successful, particularly when it is gained via the promotion of a soft culture used as a dominating tactic. It has always had disastrous effects on both the victimized and the perpetrators. The ambition for power among various social structures and their efforts to gain power through cultural hegemony (promotion of soft image) is the focus of the current research paper within the parameters of Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony as portrayed in The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende. Social scientists, critics, and fiction writers have all examined how power is used and its results regarding human dealings. The current study focuses on the power dynamics among various social organizations that influence various institutions run by tyrannical leadership. Both analytical and descriptive research designs are employed in this qualitative research study. The data has been analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach that reveals how the exercise of power was improperly used against the subordinates. Various social structures gain power by setting a soft culture and showing only their malign side to exploit and subjugate the less-powerful group of the society.

Keywords

Egalitarian, Multicultural, Plurality, Harmony, Peace, Community, Diversity.

PDF

Author Biography

Abrar Ahmed

 

 

Manzoor Elahi

lecturer in english at hazara university mansehara

Zeeshan Shahjehan

in this artile she is first author. she serves as lecturer in english in hazara university mansehra mansehra

 

 


References

  1. Allende, I. (1986). The house of the spirits. London: Black Swan, Tran’s world Publishers.
  2. Barnett, M. and Duval, R. (2005). Power in international politics. New York: The MIT
  3. Press.
  4. Depue, A. (2015). Social policy and inequality social stratification in Latin America American journal of sociology. The university of Chicago press, 58.4.
  5. Echevarria, G. (2000). Modern Latin American literature: an introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
  6. Foucault, M. (1994). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  7. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
  8. Foucault, M.(1982). The subject and power. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  9. Gramsci, A. (2010). Prison notebooks. USA: Colombia University Press.
  10. Sadan, E. (1997). Empowerment and community planning: theory and practice of people-focused social solutions. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz. Hameuchad Publishers.Steven, L. (2005). Power: a radical view. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Allende, I. (1986). /9 The house of the spirits. London: Black Swan, Transworld Publishers.
  12. Barnett, M. and Duval, R. (2005). Power in international politics. New York: The MIT
  13. Press.
  14. Early, E. (2001). The history atlas of south America. New York: A Simon & Schuster Macmillan Company.
  15. Mcsherry, J. P. (1992). Military Power, Impunity and States Society Change in Latin
  16. American. Canadian journal of political science. 25(3).
  17. Swanson, P. (2005). Latin American fiction: A short introduction. USA: Blackwell. Publishing.
  18. Thomas, S. C. (2005). Understanding Latin American politics: six factors to consider. University of Alaska Southeast.
  19. Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift: knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st
  20. century. Bentam Books. www.jstor.org
  21. Van Wormer, K and C. (2000). Women and the criminal justice system. Boston: Allyn& Bacon. Von Norden, Andrew
  22. William, L. (2004). The twentieth century Spanish American literature. USA:
  23. University of Texas Press.
  24. Warfield, A. A. (2014). The tragedy of progress. A political companion to John Steinbeck. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
  25. Waldron (2008). The Pearl and The Old Manand the Sea: A Comparative Analysis.
  26. John Steinbeck.7(11). New York: Info Base Publisher.