Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Developing English Language Productive Skills Through Task-Based Language Learning Model At Tertiary Level Education In Karachi


  This current research study aims to utilize the Task-Based Language Learning (TBLL) approach. The primary aim behind designing this approach was to analyse the effects of the TBLL approach on enhancing and developing students’ English speaking skills at the tertiary level. Generally, English is the academic and official language of Pakistan. It has a great significance in Pakistan. After twelve years of schooling and learning the English language, Pakistani students become shy and hesitant in expressing their arguments, views, and ideas. The major concern behind this issue is either teaching methodology or the curriculum taught in Schools and Colleges. Contrary to Pakistan, the modern world has benefited from new trends and teaching methods. This study is truly experimental in nature and data was collected through pre- and post-tests from the control group and experimental group to see if mean scores of the treatment and control groups. On the post-test, there was a substantial difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of English language speaking skills, according to the findings of this study. The mean scores of both groups on the post-test were more advanced than the pre-test mean scores of the mentioned groups. Moreover, the mean score of the control and experimental groups in the context of to post-test provided noticeable evidence of improvement in the students' speaking skills. The t-test results denote significant differences. It was proved that the TBLL method effectively enhances students’ communication skills such as vocabulary, pronunciation, presentation, accuracy, and fluency.


TBLT Experimental, , Productive skills, , speaking skills, , CLT, , GT



  1. Ahmed (2020). The Effectiveness of Technology-mediated Task-Based Language Teaching in Teaching English Writing Skills to the Students of Higher Secondary Level Hamdard Islamicus, Vol. 43 No. 1 (2020), 259-272
  2. Aslam, F., Khan, A., & Shafique, N. (2023). A Study to Investigate the Productiveness of the Compulsory English Course in Enhancing English Language Skills. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 283–293A. Retrieved from
  3. Bouwer, R., Lesterhuis, M. ., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & De Maeyer, S. (2023). Comparative approaches to the assessment of writing: Reliability and validity of benchmark rating and comparative judgement. Journal of Writing Research, 15(3), 497–518.
  4. Cohen & Morrison (2000). Research Methods in Education. (5thed.) London: Routledge Falmer.
  5. Crandall & Tucker (1990). Content-Based Instruction in Second and Foreign Languages. Foreign language education: Issues and strategies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  6. Daza-Pérez, L., Llanes-Ordóñez, J. & Figuera-Gazo, P. Exploring the persistence of adults on secondary education courses: occupational status, satisfaction and self-efficacy as key factors. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 13, 6 (2024).
  7. Foster & Skehan (2011). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), 299-324.
  8. Fries (2003). Norm and Variability in Language Use and Language Learning. London: Oxford University Press.
  9. Khan (2020). Analysis of EFL Teaching in Pakistan: Method and Strategies in the Post method Era. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language. Vol. 2, No. 3, December 2020, pp. 93-100
  10. Nayyar & Salim (2005). The Subtle Subversion: the State of Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan. Islamabad: SDPI.
  11. Nunan (2003). The Learner-centred Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan (2006). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Nunan (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining ‘task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
  13. Prabhu (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Rahman (2004). Language Policy and Localization in Pakistan: Proposal for a Paradigmatic Shift. SCALLA Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3(1), 126-142.
  15. Rahman (2007). ‘Denizens of Alien Worlds: A Survey of the Education System of Pakistan’.
  16. Richards & Rodgers 2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University.
  17. Richards & Rodgers (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Richards & Schmidt (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman, Pearson Education.
  19. Richards (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Ruenyoot (2010). A study of using the Task-based Approach to Enhance Listening and Speaking Skills of Students in Primary 3 Bangkhuntiensuksa School.
  21. Santo (2020). The Discussion of Communicative Language Teaching Approach in Language Classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research Vol. 7, No. 2, 104-109, 2020 ISSN(E) 2410-9991 / ISSN(P) 2518-0169
  22. Schmidt (2002). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
  23. Schmidt (2005). A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning; Consciousness and foreign language learning. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
  24. Shamim (2011). English as the language of development in Pakistan: Issues,
  25. challenges and possible solutions. UK: British Council Org.
  26. Skehan & Foster (2011). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16-33
  27. Skehan (2008). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Open University Press.
  28. Stavans, A., & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S. (2023). Text structure as an indicator of the writing development of descriptive text quality. Journal of Writing Research, 15(3), 463–496.
  29. Syed Khuram Shahzad, Samina Sarwat, & Shamsa Kanwal. (2023). Use Of Semantic and Clustering Methods: for Teaching English Vocabulary At Elementary Level. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 74–84. Retrieved from
  30. Syed Khuram Shahzad, Samina Sarwat, & Ishrat Ramzan. (2023). Examining the Relationship between Empathy and English Language Proficiency in BS English Students at KFUEIT. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 30–40. Retrieved from
  31. Tong, X., Yu, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Syntactic Skills and Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Investigation. Review of Educational Research, 0(0).
  32. Warsi (2004). Conditions under which English is Taught in Pakistan: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Institute for English Language Programs. Harvard University: Cambridge.
  33. Willis (2003). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman Harlow.
  34. Willis & Willis (2004). Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.
  35. Zaki (2020). The Impact of Task-based Language Teaching on the Speaking Skill: An Experimental Study of Pakistani ESL Learners. Competitive Linguistic Research Journal (CLRJ), 1(2),