Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri's Methodology In Extracting and Deriving Rulings: A Comprehensive Analysis Of Bazlulalmajhood

Abstract

Maulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri's 1825 (methodological approach in extracting and deriving rulings stands as a testament to his scholarly depth and meticulousness. Maulana's scholarly journey navigated the realms of Hadith, Fiqh, and Uslu al-Fiqh having a profound impact on Islamic jurisprudence. This research paper explores Saharanpuri’s distinctive methodology, characterized by a unique traditional scholarship and critical analysis. Noteworthy is his dedication to teaching and emphasis on the Sunan Abi Dawood, evidence of his scholarly rigour and commitment of particular interest is Saharanpuri's quest for a comprehensive commentary, spanning over a decade, showcasing his relentless scholarly excellence. Furthermore, his adeptness in Fiqh earned him recognition among simultaneous scholars, who sought his counsel on various jurisprudential matters. Saharanpuri's approach is his nuanced handling of evidentiary sources. While he often relies on Hadith to establish the Hanafi school of thought, he also draws from the principles of jurist Saharanpuri's Methodology in Extracting and Deriving Rulings. In the field of jurisprudence (Fiqh) as well, your scholarly diligence was acknowledged by all contemporary scholars. Various scholars have sought your opinion on different legal issues. Under your supervision, the institution's fatwa department was managed and operated. There were four volumes comprising four thousand fatwas, most of which were written by your blessed hands, or were written under your guidance, or were authenticated by you. During the explanation of hadiths, Maulana elaborates on jurisprudential issues with considerable detail. He vigorously defends the Hanafi school of thought vigorously, presenting both rational and textual evidence in its support.