Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

When Likes Turn to Loathing: A Critical Exploration of Toxicity of Influencer Culture on Instagram in Pakistan

Abstract

Social media has provided a space where individuals and groups can present their diverse opinions, but it can also promote prejudice, bias, fear, and hatred, spread misinformation, and provoke violence and harassment through its feedback mechanisms. Keeping in view the mentioned characteristics, the present study inspects the continuous hate speech against a Dubai-based Pakistani social media influencer, Adnan Zafar. The study was conducted on comments on his Instagram account (@ken_doll_dubaiii) comprising of offensive gender-based abuse, monetary condemnation and transgressive allegations using social media Critical Discourse which refers to the language and communication used in social media messages. It involves analyzing the words, phrases, and structure of these messages to comprehend the core beliefs, values, and attitudes being conveyed. The comments extracted using free-of-cost Instagram API, reflect established and firm patriarchal norms and the use of deliberate religious commentary to impose adherence. The findings of the study highlight that social media despite providing a platform for open discussions in conservative societies like Pakistan, also shows the disparity in authority and cultural partiality. The case of Adnan Zafar also reveals the multi-facet perspective of social media to be used to raise a voice against well-established practices in society as well as a tool for intensifying hate speech. The study also signifies the wider discussion regarding the role of social media in mirroring society's practices, along with the pressing requirement to tackle and counter hate speech on digital platforms. 

Keywords

Speech, Instagram, Pakistan, Patriarchal, Allegations

PDF

References

  1. Abid, A. A., Shami, S., &Ashfaq, A. (2021). Facebook and hate speech: Analyzing the relationship between consumers' attributes and Islamic sectarian content on social media in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 11(1), 453-462. doi:10.32350/jitc.111.2
  2. Adnan, M., Sultana, I., & Khalid, A. (2020). Social media and hate speech: The case of sectarian divide in Pakistan. HamdardIslamicus, 43(2), 120-131.
  3. Ali, R., & Batool, S. (2015). Stereotypical identities discourse analysis of media images of women in Pakistan. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 4(2), 690-717. doi:10.17583/generos.2015.1502
  4. Allan, S., Branston, G., & Carter, C. (2002). News, gender and power. Routledge.
  5. Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5(8).
  6. Auti, N., Ranaware, S., Ghadge, S., Jadhav, R., & Jagtap, P. (2023). Social Media based Hate Speech Detection using Machine Learning. Ijraset Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(5), 2729-2736.
  7. Awan, I. (2016). Islamophobia on Social Media: A Qualitative Analysis of the Facebook’s Walls of Hate. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.58517
  8. Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17-34. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070
  9. Baker, P. (2001). Moral panic and alternative identity construction in Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), 0-0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00136.x
  10. Banks, J. (2010). Regulating hate speech online. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 24(3), 233-239. doi:10.1080/13600869.2010.522323
  11. Cochran, A., Kao, L. S., Gusani, N. J., Suliburk, J. W., & Nwomeh, B. C. (2014). Use of Twitter to document the 2013 academic surgical Congress. Journal of Surgical Research, 190(1), 36-40. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.029
  12. Dad, K., Shabbir, I., & Sultan, D. F. (2023). Reasons for Code-Switching and Mixing: A Gender-Based Comparative Study of Social Interactions on Twitter. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 207–217A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/283
  13. Döring, N., & Mohseni, M. R. (2020). Gendered hate speech in YouTube and YouNow comments: Results of two content analyses. Studies in Communication and Media, 9(1), 62-88. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2020-1-62
  14. Evolvi, G. (2017). #Islamexit: Inter-group antagonism on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 386-401. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1388427
  15. Ghaffari, S. (2019). Identity, social media and religion: (De) Legitimization of identity construction through the language of religion. In Discourses of (De) Legitimization: Participatory culture in digital contexts (1st ed., pp. 326-344). Routledge.
  16. Giles, D. C. (2017). How do fan and celebrity identities become established on Twitter? A study of ‘social media natives’ and their followers. Celebrity Studies, 8(3), 445-460. doi:10.1080/19392397.2017.1305911
  17. Guschwan, M. (2015). New media: Online fandom. Soccer & Society, 17(3), 351-371. doi:10.1080/14660970.2015.1082761
  18. Hudders, L., Lou, C., & De Brabandere, M. (2021). Understanding the impact of influencers’ responses to negative follower comments on the persuasiveness of sponsored Instagram posts. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 178-204. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1963554
  19. Hurley, Z. (2019). Imagined Affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of female Gulf-Arab social media influencers. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 205630511881924. doi:10.1177/2056305118819241
  20. Irum Sindhu, & Shamsi, F. (2023). Adverse Use of Social Media by Higher Secondary School Students: A Case Study on Meta Social Network Platforms. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 205–216. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/357
  21. Iram Rubab, & Saleha Ashfaq. (2024). Genre Analysis of Suicide Notes in Pakistani TV Dramas: Unraveling Rhetorical Patterns and Communicative Intentions. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 11–18. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/381
  22. Khan, M. R., & Shahzad, P. D. S. M. (2023). Coke Studio: A Strategic Tool for Pakistan’s Cultural Diplomacy. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 315–324. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/356
  23. Kennedy, B., Golazizian, P., Trager, J., Atari, M., Hoover, J., Davani, A. M., & Dehghani, M. (2023, July 11). The (moral) language of hate. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/2/7/pgad210/7220655
  24. KhosraviNik, M. (2017b). Right wing populism in the West: Social media discourse and Echo Chambers. Insight Turkey, 19(3), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2017193.04
  25. KhosraviNik, M. (2018). Social media techno-discursive design, affective communication and contemporary politics. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), 427-442. doi:10.1007/s40647-018-0226-y
  26. KhosraviNik, M. (2023). Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Social Media Critical Discourse Studies, 1-5. doi:10.4324/9781003371496-1
  27. KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45-68. doi:10.1515/lpp-2018-0003
  28. KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. (2016). Discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. In R. Wodak& M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical disocurse studies (3rd ed., pp. 205-233). SAGE.
  29. Kopytowska, M. (2017). Introduction: Discourses of hate and Radicalism in action. In M. Kopytowska (Ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and Radicalism across space and genres (pp. 1–12). John Benjamins.
  30. Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2010). Twitter: The Electoral Connection? Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 419-436.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382749
  32. Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2021). Are they being authentic? The effects of self-disclosure and message sidedness on sponsored post effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 30-53. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1986257
  33. Maares, P., Banjac, S., & Hanusch, F. (2021). The labour of visual authenticity on social media: Exploring producers’ and audiences’ perceptions on Instagram. Poetics, 84, 101502. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101502
  34. Martikainen, I., & Pitkänen, A. (2019). The significance of consumers’ perceived authenticity to engagement-Explorative research of influencer marketing in Instagram (Unpublished master's thesis). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  35. Mathew, B., Dutt, R., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). WebSci '18: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  36. Minhas, S., & Salawu, A. (2024). Preserving and Promoting Indigenous Languages: Social Media Analysis of Punjabi and Setswana Languages. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 00219096241243061.
  37. Noor, A., Hanif, M., & Safdar, A. (2024). Female representation in Pakistani digital media: A comparative critical feministic study of Rehman’s “Mere pas tum Ho" & Ahmed’s “Sinf-E-Ahan”. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1). doi:10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i1.1989
  38. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press, USA.
  39. Peters, M. A. (2020). Limiting the capacity for hate: Hate speech, hate groups and the philosophy of hate. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2325-2330. doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1802818
  40. Phelps, C. E. (2011). Parasocial relationships and social media usage (Unpublished master's thesis). Rochester Institute of Technology , New York, NY.
  41. Pickering, M. (2001). Stereotyping: The politics of representation. NY: Red Globe Press.
  42. Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S. (2021). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication, 103-118. doi:10.4324/9781003181286-6
  43. Rafi, M. S., & Shafiq, Z. (2024). The role of political hate speech in promoting extreme ideologies and manipulating public discourse for social approval in Pakistan. International Social Science Journal. doi:10.1111/issj.12488
  44. Ramponi, A., Testa, B., Tonelli, S., & Jezek, E. (2022). Addressing religious hate online: from taxonomy creation to automated detection. PeerJ Computer Science, 8. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/articles/cs-1128/
  45. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier the edge. NY: Basic Books.
  46. Salam, R. (2021). In a world where you can be anyone: An investigation into the gendered social practices of Pakistani Facebook users. Gender Issues, 39(3), 253-274. doi:10.1007/s12147-021-09289-0
  47. Saresma, T., Karkulehto, S., & Varis, P. (2020). Gendered violence online: Hate speech as an intersection of misogyny and racism. Violence, Gender and Affect, 221-243. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56930-3_11
  48. Siddiqua, A., Gong, J., & Aksar, I. A. (2023). Twitter trolling of Pakistani female journalists: A patriarchal society glance. Media, Culture & Society, 45(6), 1303-1314. doi:10.1177/01634437231168306
  49. Siegel, A. A., & Badaan, V. (2020). #No2Sectarianism: Experimental approaches to reducing sectarian hate speech online. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 837-855. doi:10.1017/s0003055420000283
  50. Spallaccia, B. (2017). Misogynistic hate speech on social networks: A critical discourse analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  51. Van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2020). Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(1), 66-84. doi:10.1177/1354856520902136
  52. Wahlström, M., Törnberg, A., & Ekbrand, H. (2020). Dynamics of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric in far-right social media. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3290-3311. doi:10.1177/1461444820952795