Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Review Articles

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Martin Luther King's Speech “I Have a Dream”: A Socio-Political Prospective

Published 29-09-2024

  • Arooj Rafi
    • ,
  • Fareeha Javed
    • ,
  • Sana Baig

Arooj Rafi
Student, MS TESOL, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Fareeha Javed
Associate Professor of English, Government Graduate College for Women Gulberg Lahore, Pakistan

Sana Baig
Lecturer, TESOL, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

This study examines the transformative effects of Martin Luther King Jr.’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech on societal changes. The analysis delves into how the speech catalyzed the civil rights movement by scrutinizing its key rhetorical strategies and King’s adept use of ethos, pathos, and logos to engage and persuade his audience. Delivered during the 1963 March on Washington, the speech stands as a significant moment in American history, encapsulating King’s vision of racial equality and justice in the United States. Employing a critical discourse analysis, this study explores the speech’s immediate impact on listeners, its role in spurring action, and its enduring influence on modern social justice movements both in the USA and globally. The results highlight the powerful role language plays in societal change and affirm the continuing relevance of King’s messages of hope and equality.

Keywords

Rhetoric, Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Equality

PDF

References

  1. Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
  2. Corson, D. (2000). Emancipatory leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(2), 93–120.
  3. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
  4. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  5. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of Language. Longman.
  6. Fairclough, Norman (1993). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  7. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Mariam, M., Baig, S., & Javed, F. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of ‘An American Brat’ by Bapsi Sidhwa. Global.
  9. Rehman, H., Rafi, A., & Baig, S. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistani Drama “Ranjha Ranjha Kardi”. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(3), 719–727.
  10. Taiwo, R. (2007). Tenor in electronic media Christian discourse in Southwestern Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 16(1).
  11. Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse.
  12. Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Cognitive situation models in discourse production: The expression of ethnic situations in prejudiced discourse. In Language and social situations (pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  13. Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Text, 15(3), 363–387.
  14. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.
  15. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159–177.
  16. Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1, 63-94.