Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Research Articles

Hate speech in Pakistani politics: A critical discourse analysis

Published 28-09-2024

  • Iqra Anam
    • ,
  • Hafiz Nauman Ahmed

Iqra Anam
MPhil Scholar, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan

Hafiz Nauman Ahmed
Senior Lecturer, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan,

Abstract

The political instability and polarization in Pakistan signify the need for research to address hate speech in political discourse and to foster a more inclusive and democratic political culture. The primary objectives of this study were to analyze the current state of hate speech in political discourse and propose actionable steps to mitigate its impact. The study employed Fairclough’s (2018) approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as dialectical reasoning, using it as a theoretical framework to examine the hateful speeches and statements made by prominent politicians. The analysis, structured around critique, explanation, and action, scrutinizes the adversarial rhetoric, derogatory vocabularies, and interdiscursive strategies used by political leaders. Data was collected from news reports and social media covering speeches made by key figures from Pakistan’s three main political parties: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), during the period from April 2022 to June 2024.
This period, marked by the no-confidence vote against then-Prime Minister Imran Khan, exemplifies the heightened political polarisation in the country. The findings reveal that politicians from all three parties engaged in the use of hateful and abusive language, significantly contributing to the already fragile state of democracy. It was also revealed that political discourse in Pakistan is heavily shaped by religious, nationalist, and populist rhetoric, which fuels hostility and further undermines democratic processes. The study advocates for constructive deliberation and a reframing of political discourse among party leaders to address and reverse the deteriorating situation.

Keywords

Democracy, Scrutinizes, Interdiscursivity, Political, Nationalist

PDF

References

  1. Abid, A. A., Shami, S., & Ashfaq, A. (2021). Facebook and hate speech: Analyzing the relationship between consumers' attributes and Islamic sectarian content on social media in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 11(1), 453-462.
  2. ADL. (2021). Pyramid of hate. Anti-Defamation League. https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/pyramid-of-hate-web-english_1.pdf
  3. Ahmed, H. N., & Islam, M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 on the Lexical Features of English in Pakistan. Linguistics and Literature Review, 6(2), 143-157.
  4. Akbar, M., & Safdar, A. (2024). Exploring ethnic discrimination and hate speech in online political discourses: A comprehensive analysis from the Pakistani context. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 271-283. http://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)25
  5. Al-Utbi, M. I. K. (2019). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Hate Speech. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL) Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-luġāt, (39), 19-40.
  6. Armayanti, R. (2019). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) on qualitative research: a review. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 1(1), 29-34.
  7. Brown, J. (2015). The nuanced principle of democracy: Balancing hate speech and public discourse. Publisher. p. 195.
  8. Charteris-Black, J., & Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Metaphor in political discourse. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor, 28-51.
  9. Das, D. (2024). Hate speech in India: Contemporary legal challenges and responses. Gujarat National Law University.
  10. Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M.W., & Weber, I. (2017). Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language. International Conference on Web and Social Media.
  11. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
  12. Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and social change. Wiley.
  13. Fairclough, N. (1996). A reply to Henry Widdowson’s ‘Discourse analysis: A critical view’. Language and Literature; 5(1), 49-56.
  14. Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of new labor: Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. (pp. 229-266). Sage.
  15. Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915-939.
  16. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
  17. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (1st ed., pp. 9–20). Routledge.
  18. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge.
  19. Fairclough, N. (2016). A dialectical–relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wolak & M. Meyer (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. (3rd ed., pp. 86-108). Sage.
  20. Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In J. Flowerdew & E. J. Richardson (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. (pp. 13-25). Routledge.
  21. Fairclough, N., & Scholz, R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis as ‘dialectical reasoning’: From normative critique towards action, by way of explanation. Mots. Les langages du politique, (1), 113-123.
  22. Gao, J., Zheng, P., Jia, Y., Chen, H., Mao, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Fu, H., & Dai, J. (2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during the COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE, 15.
  23. Gelber, K. (2019). Differentiating hate speech: A systemic discrimination approach. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6–8.
  24. George, C. (2015). Managing the dangers of online hate speech in South Asia. Media Asia, 42(3-4), 144-156.
  25. Hassan, A. A., Fazal, H., & Khalid, T. (2020). Political hate speech in political processions: A comparative analysis of PMLN, PPP, and PTI processions for Election 2018. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 40(2), 1161-1171.
  26. Hazenbroek, S. (2012). Politicians and hate speech: A legal comparison- South Africa and the Netherlands. Tilburg University, Netherland. Retrieved from http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=122972
  27. Hietanen, M., & Eddebo, J. (2022). Towards a definition of hate speech—with a focus on online contexts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 47(4), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685992211243099
  28. Jazeera, A. (2022, April 10). Pakistan PM Imran Khan is gone after losing a no-confidence vote. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/9/pakistan-prime-minister-imran-khan-no-confidence-vote
  29. Khan, S.K., Ahmed, F., & Mubeen, M. (2022). A Text-Mining Research Based on LDA Topic Modelling: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Pakistan's UN Assembly Speeches (1970-2018). Int. J. Humanit. Arts Comput., 16, 214-229.
  30. Lepoutre, M., Vilar Lluch, S., Borg, E., & Hansen, N. (2023). What is hate speech? The case for a corpus approach. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 18(2), 401–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09675-7
  31. Lin, A. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in applied linguistics: A methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 213-232.
  32. MacAvaney, S., Yao, H. R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N., & Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PLOS ONE, 14(8).
  33. Mayor, E., & Bietti, L. (2017). Ethnomethodological studies of nurse-patient and nurse-relative interactions: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 70, 46-57.
  34. Mehboob, N., & Alvi, U. F. (2021). An analysis of hate speech tweets against women from a socio-cognitive discourse perspective. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 5(I), 128-146.
  35. Papcunová, J., Martončik, M., Fedáková, D., Kentoš, M., Bozogáňová, M., & Adamkovič, M. (n.d.). Hate speech conceptualization: A preliminary examination of hate speech indicators and structure, 3-5. Institute of Social Sciences CSPS, Slovak Academy of Science
  36. Rafique, N., Iqbal, S., & Huma, S. (2024). Hate speech prevalence and identification in Pakistani academic environments: An exploratory study. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2024(8-II-S)03
  37. Rao, M. F. (2020). Hate speech and media information literacy in the digital age: A case study of 2018 elections in Pakistan. Global Media Journal, 18(34), 202.
  38. Salam-Salmaoui, R., & Salam, S. (2023). Twitter and politics: A framing analysis of Maryam Nawaz and Imran Khan's social media discourse. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1276639
  39. Sellars, A. (2016). Defining hate speech. Boston University School of Law. p. 30. Retrieved fromhttps://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4679&context=faculty_scholarship
  40. Shah, R. U., Saleem, K., & Shah, A. A. (2021). Hate speech in mosques versus sectarian violence in Pakistan: Causes and recommendations. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(2), April-June, 2021.
  41. Turner, D. (2022, May 16). Introducing discourse analysis for qualitative research. Quirkos Qualitative Research Blog. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://www.quirkos.com/blog/post/discourse-analysis-qualitative-research/
  42. van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideology, 11(2),115-140.
  43. Widuna, I. A. (2018). The function of CDA in media discourse studies. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 3(1), 119-128.