Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind, peer-reviewed, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Research Articles

The Politics of Misinformation: Fake News, Echo Chambers, and Public Perception

Published 28-03-2025

  • Nishat Ansar
    • ,
  • Dr Shazia Hashmat

Nishat Ansar
PhD Scholar, Department of Communication and Media Studies, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi

Dr Shazia Hashmat
Department of Communication and Media Studies, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi

Abstract

Social media is an effective communication tool, and this dramatically impacts public opinion in political, social, and regional discourse. This review study focuses on the role of social media in the broader debate of public understanding of political issues. It provides a framework for thinking about the problem of misinformation. Drawing from a sample of 47 research papers using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria and the PRISMA approach, the current study gathered and synthesised the findings of publications from the era of 2016–2025. The literature review points out that echo chambers, during which consumers are mainly exposed to content that repeats their prior beliefs, are a major cause of misinformation and fake news amplification, and thus, distorted narratives are further reinforced. This dynamic exacerbates political polarisation, undermines public confidence in institutions, and increases the polarisation gap of polarization in politics. The findings suggest that the complexity of misinformation in the digital age entails multi-disciplinary methods to address its societal impact to address its societal impact to effectively address its societal impact. The review emphasises that awareness-raising and providing critical tools for identifying misinformation are necessary and urges policymakers, media organisations, and social platforms to work together to lessen the negative impact of fake news on public perceptions and democracy. Such insights will provide a foundation for future research to design interventions to mitigate the spread of misinformation in political discourse.

Keywords

Misinformation, Polarisation, Digital, Perception, PRISMA

PDF

Author Biography

Nishat Ansar

And Lecturer, Department of Arts & Media, Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 

 

References

  1. Arias Maldonado, M. (2019). Understanding Fake News: Technology, Affects, and the Politics of the Untruth. Historia y Comunicación Social, 24(2).
  2. Braghieri, L., Levy, R., & Makarin, A. (2022). Social media and mental health. American Economic Review, 112(11), 3660–3693.
  3. Brashier, N. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2020). Aging in an era of fake news. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 316–323.
  4. Chai, S., Wei, M., Tang, L., Bi, X., Yu, Y., Yang, J., & Jie, Z. (2024). Can public opinion persuade the government to strengthen the use of environmental regulation policy tools? Evidence from policy texts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140352.
  5. Cheng, Y., & Chen, Z. F. (2021). The influence of presumed fake news influence: Examining public support for corporate corrective response, media literacy interventions, and governmental regulation. In What IS News? (pp. 103–127). Routledge.
  6. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554–559.
  7. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2014). Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 292–304.
  8. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
  9. Firdaus, N., Jumroni, J., Aziz, A., Sumartono, E., & Purwanti, A. (2024). The Influence of Social Media, Misinformation, and Digital Communication Strategies on Public Perception and Trust. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(3), 131–138.
  10. Freeze, M., Baumgartner, M., Bruno, P., Gunderson, J. R., Olin, J., Ross, M. Q., & Szafran, J. (2021). Fake claims of fake news: Political misinformation, warnings, and the tainted truth effect. Political Behavior, 43, 1433–1465.
  11. Gronholm, P. C., Kline, S., Lamba, M., Lempp, H., Mahkmud, A., Cano, G. M., Vashisht, K., San Juan, N. V., & Sunkel, C. (2024). Exploring perspectives of stigma and discrimination among people with lived experience of mental health conditions: a co-produced qualitative study. EClinicalMedicine, 70.
  12. Guess, A. M. et al. (2018). No Title. “Selective Exposure to Misinformation: Evidence from the Consumption of Fake News during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign.”
  13. Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). Inside the fake news bubble? Consumption of online fake news in the 2016 US election. Unpublished Manuscript.
  14. Guo, B., Ding, Y., Yao, L., Liang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2019). The future of misinformation detection: new perspectives and trends. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1909.03654.
  15. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
  16. Jones, T., & Evans, D. (2000). Conducting a systematic review. Australian Critical Care, 13(2), 66–71.
  17. Kem, D. (2024). The Role of Fake News in Shaping Public Perception and Trust in the Media. Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology, 2(3), 489–503.
  18. Lame, G. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1633–1642.
  19. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science (New York, N.Y.), 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  20. Li, W. (2023). The influence of social media sentiment on online public opinion in the post-truth era. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1015–1020.
  21. Luzsa, R., & Mayr, S. (2021). False consensus in the echo chamber: Exposure to favorably biased social media news feeds leads to increased perception of public support for own opinions. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(1).
  22. Menczer, F. (2016). No Title. The Spread of Misinformation in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, (p. 717). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
  23. Mims, C. (2017). No Title. How Facebook’s Master Algorithm Powers the Social Network; The Algorithm behind Facebook’s News Feed, a ”modular Layered Cake,” Extracts Meaning from Every Post and Photo. Wall Street Journal. Https://Www.Wsj.Com/Articles/How-Facebooks-Master- Algorithm-P.
  24. Nanabala, C., Mohan, C. K., & Zafarani, R. (2024). Unmasking ai-generated fake news across multiple domains. Preprints, 2024050686.
  25. Nasery, M., Turel, O., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Combating fake news on social media: a framework, review, and future opportunities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 53(1), 833–876.
  26. NRP. (2016). No Title. Fake News Expert on How False Stories Spread and Why People Believe Them.” NPR. Https://Www.Npr.Org/2016/12/14/505547295/Fake-News-Expert-on-How-False-Stories- Spread-and-Why-People-Believe-Them.
  27. Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
  28. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372.
  29. Pérez-Escolar, M., Lilleker, D., & Tapia-Frade, A. (2023). A systematic literature review of the phenomenon of disinformation and misinformation. Media and Communication, 11(2), 76–87.
  30. Prisma. (2020). No Title. Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Oxford University.
  31. Silverman. (2016). No Title. This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News On Facebook Https://Www.Buzzfeednews.Com/Article/Craigsilverman/Viral-Fake-Election-News-Outperformed-Real-News-on-Facebook.
  32. Suryana, C., Budiandru, B., Naibaho, K. E. T., Setianti, Y., & Purwosusanto, H. (2024). The Impact of Fake News on Public Opinion during Crisis Situations. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(4), 395–407.
  33. Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020). Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: literature review and synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 157–173.
  34. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.