Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Review Articles

A Lacanian Analysis of Prospero as the Big Other in “The Tempest” by Shakespeare

Published 14-09-2024

  • Muhammad Sajjad
    • ,
  • Dr. Atteq-Ur-Rehman

Muhammad Sajjad
MPhil Scholar, Department of English, Islamia College University Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Dr. Atteq-Ur-Rehman
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Islamia College University Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Abstract

This study intends to prove how Prospero, the central character in Shakespeare’s The Tempest (1610-1611), embodies Jacques Lacan’s concept of the “big Other” a symbolic authority that governs a subject’s desire, identity, and social norms. By applying it, this study demonstrates how Prospero, through his use of language, magic, and psychological manipulation, establishes and maintains the symbolic order on the island and thus effectively controls the behaviours, desires, and identities of the other characters (subjects) in the play. Through a close reading of the text, this study shows that Prospero’s role as the “big Other” is crucial to understanding the dynamics of power, i.e., how his authority extends beyond physical dominance to shape the very reality within which the characters exist. This analysis offers a fresh perspective on the mechanisms of authority and control in The Tempest. The findings of this study contribute to the field of psychoanalytic literary criticism by stressing the relevance of Lacanian theory in interpreting Shakespeare’s work, as well as suggest that further applications of Lacanian theory to Shakespeare’s works could enhance our understanding of the complex dynamics of control and desire in these texts.

Keywords

Shakespeare, Tempest, Prospero, Lacan, Symbolic

PDF

References

  1. Ayub, S., Akbar, N., & Bashir, A. (2023). Lacanian psychoanalysis: Structural analysis of personality using Borromean model in the film ‘The Pale Blue Eye.’ Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 10(1), 207–216.
  2. Arcilla, F. Jr (2023). Exploring the Dichotomy of Power and Oppression in William Shakespeare’s the Tempest: A Formalistic Analysis. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4622963.
  3. Brown, P. (1985). This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine’: The Tempest and the discourse of colonialism. In J. Dollimore & A. Sinfield (Eds.), Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. UK, Manchester University Press
  4. Blum, V., & Nast, H. (2002). Jacques Lacan’s two-dimensional subjectivity. In Thinking space (pp. 183-204). Routledge.
  5. Cârstea, D. (2022). The Picture of Dorian Gray; The Return of the Real: A Lacanian Perspective. European Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejbs.v4i3.713
  6. Callaghan, D. (2002). Shakespeare without women.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203457726
  7. Devi, J. P., Mirunalini, S., Bhuvaneshwari, A., & Sasikala, R. (2022). Shakespeare and psychology: A study of the soliloquies of select major tragedies. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan College of Arts and Science for Women.
  8. Díaz-Vera, J. E. (2024). Old English emotion is temperature: Cultural influences on a universal experience. Russian Journal Of Linguistics, 28(1), 33-54. doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-34603
  9. Even, D. (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Routledge
  10. Grigg, R. (2009). Lacan, language, and philosophy. State University of New York Press.
  11. Gallagher, C. and Greenblatt, S. (2000). Practicing New Historicism: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772561.001.0001
  12. Hearns, A. (2011). ‘I am I’: A Lacanian analysis of Richard III. PsyArt: An Online Journal for Psychological Studies and the Art: https://psyartjournal.com/article/show/hearns-i_am_i_a_lacanian_analysis_of_richard_ii
  13. Hook, D. (2008). Absolute other: lacan's ‘big other’ as adjunct to critical social psychological analysis? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00067.x
  14. Macey, D. (2002). On the subject of Lacan. In Psychoanalysis in Context. Routledge.
  15. Mebane, J. S. (1989). Renaissance magic and the return of the golden age: The occult tradition and Marlowe, Jonson, and Shakespeare. University of Nebraska Press.
  16. Ridge, Kelsey (2016). This Island’s Mine: Ownership of the Island in The Tempest”. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 16 (2): 231–245. Doi:10.1111/sena.1218
  17. Morrison, J. (2020). 4. The Struggle for Power in Shakespeare's The Tempest.
  18. Mas Solé, G. (2020). *A Method in Their Madness: A Psychoanalytic Approach to Shakespeare’s Construction of Evil [Undergraduate thesis, English Studies Degree].
  19. Marín Calderón, N. (2015). A Lacanian reading of Hamlet: The mourning subject of desire. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 22, 25–34.
  20. May-Hobbs, M. (2023). What Is Jacques Lacan’s Mysterious Big Other? The Collector. URL: https://www.thecollector.com/jacques-lacan-big-other/
  21. Rasheed, S. (2021). Psycho-existential displacement in shakespeare’s the tempest: a fanonian study. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(IV), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-iv)15
  22. Shakespeare, W. (2005). The Tempest. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Soomro, M. A., & Shayan Aqdas. (2023). A Review of "Politeness - West and East" : by Geoffrey Leech and Tatiana Larina. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 12–17B. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/282
  24. Soomro, M. A., & Shayan Aqdas. (2023). Research in Im/Politeness Across Cultures and Contexts. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 122–129. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/281
  25. Tuğlu, B. (2016). Identities in The Tempest, Tempests in Identities. International Journal of English and Literature. Vol.7(5), pp. 62-68, May 2016. https://academicjournals.org/journal/IJEL/article-full-text-pdf/280722E58642.
  26. Uddin, D. R., & Anwar, S. (2024). A Postcolonial Perspective of Alterity in Michael Ondaatje’s The English Patient. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 13–24B. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/379
  27. Zibin, A., & Solopova, O. A. (2024). Metaphors across languages, cultures and discourses: A research agenda. Russian Journal Of Linguistics, 28(1), 7-32. doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-37837