Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Resisting Hegemonic Masculinity: : An Exploration of Social Constructions of Masculinity in Anna Burns' Milkman (2018)

Abstract

This study examines the role of hegemonic masculinity and its impact on the social constructions of masculinity as portrayed in Anna Burns’ Milkman (2018). Centered on Gender Studies and grounded in R. W. Connell’s theory of Hegemonic Masculinity (1995), it investigates how traditional gender roles and authority are both resisted and assimilated by the novel’s characters. The research demonstrates that hegemonic masculinity not only reinforces patriarchal norms and misogyny but also intensifies female resistance, shedding light on the complex interplay between power and gender. While it has often served as a barrier to gender equality by perpetuating patriarchal norms and misogyny, it has also ignited feminist activism by aggravating resistance. By examining this dynamic, the analysis highlights the ongoing gender struggle for equal rights and societal justice. The study also explores how these gendered power structures manifest in the everyday experiences of the characters, illustrating the pervasive influence of hegemonic masculinity on their lives and interactions. This deeper understanding offers valuable insights into the impact of hegemonic masculinity on societal structures, contributing to the broader discourse on gender and power. The research recommends the necessity of continued critical examination of the resistance against hegemonic masculinity to advance gender equity to challenge entrenched patriarchal systems.

Keywords

Hegemonic, Masculinity, Feminist, Misogyny, Gender

PDF

References

  1. Bashir, T., Firdaus, A., & Sajid, S. (2023). Women-nature narrative and patriarchal violence: An ecofeminist critique of Uzma Aslam Khan’s Trespassing. International Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 82-96
  2. Beauvoir, S. de. (2015). The second sex. Vintage Classics.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford UP Google schola, 2, 63-85.
  4. Burns, A. (2018). Milkman. Faber & Faber
  5. Brigida, M. S., & Pinho, D. (2021). Mourning the Troubles: Anna Burns’s Milkman as a Gendered Response to the Belfast Agreement. Ilha do Desterro, 74, 435-449.
  6. Connell, R. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859.
  7. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. St. Leonards, N.S.W : Allen & Unwin
  8. Connell, R. (2020). The social organization of masculinity. Feminist Theory Reader Routledge, 4(1), 192-200.
  9. Connell, R. (2014). The study of masculinities. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(1), 5-15.
  10. Dad, K., Shabbir, I., & Sultan, D. F. (2023). Reasons for Code-Switching and Mixing: A Gender-Based Comparative Study of Social Interactions on Twitter. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 207–217A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/283
  11. Demetriou, Demetrakis Z. (2001). Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337-361.
  12. Duncanson, C. (2015). Hegemonic Masculinity and the Possibility of Change in Gender Relations. Men and Masculinities, 18(2), 231-248.
  13. Faludi, Susan. Backlash: the undeclared war against American women//Review. Canadian Woman Studies 14.2 (1994): 127.
  14. Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, New York: Pantheon.
  15. Gillett, J., & White, P. G. (1992). Male bodybuilding and the reassertion of hegemonic masculinity: A critical feminist perspective. Play & Culture, 5(4), 358–369.
  16. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
  17. Jewkes, R., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., Lundqvist, E., Blackbeard, D., Lindegger, G., Quayle, M., Sikweyiya, Y., & Gottzén, L. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(S2), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094
  18. Kandiyoti, D. (1998). Bargaining with Patriarchy, Gender and Society, 2(3), 274-290
  19. Kronsell, A. (2005). Gendered practices in institutions of hegemonic masculinity: Reflections from feminist standpoint theory. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(2), 280-298.
  20. Kimmel, M., & Wade, L. (2018). Ask a feminist: Michael Kimmel and Lisa Wade discuss toxic masculinity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(1), 233-254.
  21. Kronsell, A. (2006). Methods for studying silences: gender analysis in institutions of hegemonic masculinity. Feminist methodologies for international relations, 1, 108-128.
  22. Neupane, L. (2021). Commodification of Women in Anna Burns's Milkman (Doctoral dissertation, Department of English).
  23. Pettersson, M. (2017). Constructions of Masculinity in Salman Rushdie’s Novel The Satanic Verses.
  24. Puente, G., & Carbonell, S. (2024). The Non-Neutrality in Social Education: Positioning of Catalan Public Universities on Gender Violence. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.13783
  25. Ralph, B. (2023). The destabilizing effect of feminist, queer-inclusion and therapeutic counter-discourse: A feminist poststructuralist account of change in men's friendships. Journal of Sociology, 14407833231162637.
  26. Ritchie, S. (2022). Hegemonic masculinity. Encyclopedia of queer studies in education, 4, 238-243.
  27. Shehzad, A., & Parveen, S. (2021). Discursive representation of women’s subjectivity: A Feminist critique of Anna Burns’ Milkman. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(18), 85-96.
  28. Soomro, M. A., & Shayan Aqdas. (2023). A Review of "Politeness - West and East": by Geoffrey Leech and Tatiana Larina. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 12–17B. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/282
  29. Tahira Asgher, Muhammad Saleem, & Dr. Asma Kashif Shahzad. (2023). Eco Linguistics-Infused Procedural Text Learning for ESL Students’ Success. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 01–12. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/337
  30. Uddin, D. R., & Anwar, S. (2024). A Postcolonial Perspective of Alterity in Michael Ondaatje’s The English Patient. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 13–24B. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/379
  31. Zeeshan, S. (2022). Madness as Insurrection: Decolonizing the Doubly Colonized Female Self in Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 61-72.