Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of the motivational Techniques on Academic Achievement of Elementary School Students

Abstract

  The main aim of the study was to find out the effect of motivation on the academic achievements of the students. The objectives of the study were to explore the motivational techniques of elementary school teachers and to evaluate the effect of the motivational techniques of elementary teachers on the academic achievement of students. Ex-post-facto design was used to conduct the research, and a survey method was used to collect the data. 3768 elementary school teachers at public sector elementary schools of district Kotli were the population of the study. A stratified r, random sampling technique was used to select the sample. 309 (200 female, and 109 male) elementary school teachers were the sample of the study. A five-point Likert scale questionnaire developed by the researcher was used to collect the data. The questionnaire consisted of twelve motivational techniques and 48 statements. Based on the results of pilot testing reliability of the instrument was checked by using Cronbach's alpha statistical technique. The reliability of the instrument was 0.79. Data were analyzed by using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the motivational techniques, whereas regression analyses were used to find out the impact of the motivational techniques. It was concluded that motivational techniques have a significant effect on the academic achievement of the students. It is recommended that the teachers use techniques such as “make content relevant to students”, and “values, and goals, and reward student achievement, and learning efforts” to get good grades from their students.

Keywords

Techniques, , Academic, , Achievements, , Teachers, , Students

PDF

References

  1. Asal, I., Yousuf, D. M. I., & DR Muhammad Imran. (2024). Parents and Teachers Attitudes toward Life Skills-based Education at Elementary Level. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 64–76. Retrieved from https://jar.bworesearches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/210
  2. Batool, R., Dr. Faqir M. Aslam Rana, & Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Qasim. (2024). Investigating Gender Perceptions on Technology Use in Pakistan ELT Classrooms: A Survey-Based Study. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 58–63. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/385
  3. Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21.
  4. Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.
  5. Carayannis, E. G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A C, and Look at How Much Students Learn, and Why They Should Be Learning More. London: Our Underachieving Colleges.
  6. Chanchinmawia, F. (2018). Parenting- The H, andbook of Cross Cultural Developmental Science. New York: Taylor , and Francis, 259–277.
  7. Cornish, E. (2004). The influence of experience , and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge h, andbook of expertise , and expert performance, 38, 685-705.
  8. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning , and development: Sustaining commitment , and effectiveness over a career. Oxford review of education, 33(4), 423-443.
  9. Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation, and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International journal of technology, and design education, 13(3), 255-272.
  10. Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Study of emerging Technology, and their Impact on Teaching Learning Process: Islamabad: AIOU
  11. Eekelaar, J. (2018). The interests of the child, and the child's wishes: the role of dynamic self-determinism. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 8(1), 42-61.
  12. Filgona, J., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education, and social studies, 10(4), 16-37.
  13. Flexner, A. (2002). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company
  14. Freeman, D. (2001). Second language teacher education. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, 72-79.
  15. Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (2012). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. Routledge.
  16. Gordon, T., & Burch, N. (2003). Teacher effectiveness training: The program has proven to help teachers bring out the best in students of all ages. Three Rivers Press (CA).
  17. Hussain, D. M. S., Rubab, D. I., & Ms Sheeza Tufail. (2023). Use of Social Networking Applications in English Language Teaching (ELT): Adult Learners’ Perceptions In Pakistani ESL Context. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 13–24. Retrieved from https://jar.bworesearches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/336
  18. Jackman, P. (2015). Argumentative Interactions, and the Social Knowledge. New York: In: MULLER, Nathalie; PERRET-CLERMONT, Anne. (Eds.). Argumentation , and education.
  19. Marzano, R. J. (2004). The Home Literacy Activities, Mothers Verbal Behaviour , and Toddler-Mother Joint Attention: The Relationship to the Language Cognitive Development of Toddlers. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 33(3): 199.
  20. Morris, L., Ma, M., & Wu, P. C. (2014). Agile innovation: the revolutionary approach to accelerate success, inspire engagement, , and ignite creativity. Chicago: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company
  21. Nemer, K. M. (2002). Understudied education: Toward building a homeschooling research agenda. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
  22. Rai Hassan Iqbal, & Dr Syed Kazim Shah. (2023). Exploring the Social Context of Online English Language Teaching (ELT) Platforms: A Critical Discourse Analysis of YouTube Comments. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 283–293A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/331
  23. Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., Potter, D., & Chapman, C. (2001). School improvement for schools facing challenging circumstances: A review of research, and practice. Washington: Yorkshire University.
  24. Rosemarin, S. (2009). Who is the Best Teacher? Do Different Kinds of Students Have Different Preferences? Gifted Education International, 25(1), 48-55.
  25. Schwab, J. J. (2001). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239-265.
  26. Siedentop, D. L., Hastie, P., & Van der Mars, H. (2019). Black-white distinctions in success: The importance of early childhood education in Western countries. St. Paul, MN: Red leaf Press.
  27. Suwartono, T., Mularsih, P. S., & Khomsatun, K. (2022). Good Or Bad Teaching Practices? Learning From Efl Classrooms. Khazanah Pendidikan, 16(1), 103-116.
  28. Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems, and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
  29. Syed Khuram Shahzad, Samina Sarwat, & Shamsa Kanwal. (2023). Use Of Semantic and Clustering Methods: for Teaching English Vocabulary At Elementary Level. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 74–84. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/302
  30. Tahira Asgher, Muhammad Saleem, & Dr. Asma Kashif Shahzad. (2023). Eco Linguistics-Infused Procedural Text Learning for ESL Students’ Success. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 01–12. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/337
  31. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-h, handicapping, and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, , and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 251.
  32. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice, and student learning. Teaching, and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.
  33. Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers as the motivational contexts. In H, handbook of motivation at school (pp. 315-336). Routledge.