Journal of Academic Research for Humanities (JARH) is a double-blind peer-review, Open Free Access, online Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
The International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities"

Research Articles

Improving Vocabulary Mastery: The Impact Of Ending Letter Activities On 8th Graders' Word Recognition

Published 15-06-2024

  • Syed Razi Ul Hussnain
    • ,
  • Dr. Adeel Ahmed Khan
    • ,
  • Dr Rabia Khursheed

Syed Razi Ul Hussnain
MPhil Scholar, Institute of Education, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad, Muzaffarabad, AJK

Dr. Adeel Ahmed Khan
Assistant Professor, Institute of Education, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad, AJK,

Dr Rabia Khursheed
Assistant Professor, Institute of Education, University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad, AJK,

Abstract

  This investigation study objectives to "Improving Vocabulary Mastery: The Impact of Ending Letter Activities on 8th Graders' Word Recognition" examines how giving eighth-grade pupils word recognition and vocabulary exercises centered on word endings might improve their performance. These exercises might involve word ending matching, suffix addition, and spelling variants. By increasing students' awareness of word structures and patterns, these exercises help them become more proficient and retain language better overall increasing English vocabulary recognition among 8th-grade students through the practice of an ending letter action. This study addresses a gap in current educational practices by implementing a four-week intervention designed to actively engage learners in vocabulary acquisition. Recognizing diverse learning styles, particularly verbal and visual, the research aims to move beyond traditional passive learning methods typically employed in instruction. By integrating games into the learning process, the study evaluates the effectiveness of these activities in enhancing academic performance and fostering an optimal learning environment. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data were collected through MCQ tests, comprising pre-and post-tests of equal difficulty, to measure the intervention's impact. All 29 participating students volunteered for the classroom assessment. The results indicate a significant improvement in vocabulary recognition, validating the efficacy of the activities for instructional purposes. The study suggests implications for future research and educational policy, highlighting the importance of incorporating active learning strategies into pedagogical practices. The findings underscore the value of these activities in enhancing time management and facilitating concept comprehension among students.

Keywords

Improving, , English, , Vocabulary, , Activities, , Recognition

PDF

References

  1. August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005).The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50-57.
  2. Aman, S., Dr Muhammad Asif, & Mehvish Muzaffar. (2023). Investigation of the Relationship of Vocabulary Size and Vocabulary Depth: A Study of IELTS Test Takers of Major and Minor Cities in Punjab Pakistan. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 95–104. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/312
  3. Armstrong, T. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making the words come alive. ASCD.
  4. Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248-1266.
  5. Asal, I., Yousuf, D. M. I., & DR Muhammad Imran. (2024). Parents and Teachers Attitudes toward Life Skills-based Education at Elementary Level. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(1), 64–76. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/210
  6. Aslam, F., Khan, A., & Shafique, N. (2023). A Study to Investigate the Productiveness of the Compulsory English Course in Enhancing English Language Skills. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 283–293A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/332
  7. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675.
  8. Bouwer, R., Lesterhuis, M. ., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & De Maeyer, S. (2023). Comparative approaches to the assessment of writing: Reliability and validity of benchmark rating and comparative judgement. Journal of Writing Research, 15(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.15.03.03
  9. Carlisle, A. A. (2016). The effect of a morphological awareness intervention on early writing outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri--Columbia).
  10. Cameron, M. J., Shahin, J., &Lockerman, N. (2024). Commentary on “Collective effort to enhance the quality of research evidence in intellectual and developmental disabilities: A case study of an academic-practice network”. Tizard Learning Disability Review.
  11. Dowding, D. (2013). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. In J. W. Creswell, A. Klassen, V. L. Plano Clark, & K. Clegg Smith (Eds.), Qualitative methods overview (pp. 69-92). Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.
  12. DeGue, S., Niolon, P. H., Estefan, L. F., Tracy, A. J., Le, V. D., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., ... & Taylor, B. (2021). Effects of Dating Matters® on sexual violence and sexual harassment outcomes among middle school youth: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 22, 175-185.
  13. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
  14. Fani, T., &Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549-1554.
  15. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. ASCD.
  16. Fu, J. (2009). A study of learning styles, teaching styles and vocabulary teaching strategies in Chinese primary school: How do they differ and how can they be integrated?
  17. Guthrie, J. T., &Wigfield, A. (2017). Literacy engagement and motivation: Rationale, research, teaching, and assessment. In D. E.
  18. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, M. Sailors, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 57-84). Routledge.
  19. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
  20. Heinzmann, S., Köylü, Z., & Ehrsam, K. (2024). The learning potential of English as a lingua franca context in the eyes of study abroad students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.34274
  21. Huang, Y. M., Kuo, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2008). Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1205-1226.
  22. Hussain, D. M. S., Rubab, D. I., & Ms Sheeza Tufail. (2023). Use of Social Networking Applications in English Language Teaching (ELT): Adult Learners’ Perceptions In Pakistani ESL Context. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 13–24. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/336
  23. Józsa, K., Amukune, S., Zentai, G., & Barrett, K. C. (2022). School readiness test and intelligence in preschool as predictors of middle school success: Result of an eight-year longitudinal study. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 66.
  24. Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio‐cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 505-519.
  25. Kumpulainen, K., &Kaartinen, S. (2000). Situational mechanisms of peer group interaction in collaborative meaning-making: Processes and conditions for learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 431-454.
  26. Laghari, D. M. A., Chachar, D. Z. A., & Saima Bachal. (2023). An overview of the influence of teachers` subject matter knowledge on students’ academic achievement. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 252–258A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/327
  27. Leacox, L., & Jackson, C. W. (2014).Spanish vocabulary-bridging technology-enhanced instruction for young English language learners’ word learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 175-197.
  28. Lian, L. H., & Peng, P. Y. (2021).Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education.
  29. Marulis, L. M., &Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300335.
  30. Nagy, W. E., &Hiebert, E. H. (2011).Toward a theory of word selection. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Volume IV (pp. 388-404). Routledge.
  31. Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System, 105, 102755.
  32. O'Connor, R. E. (2014). Teaching word recognition: Effective strategies for students with learning difficulties. Guilford Publications.
  33. Rai Hassan Iqbal, & Dr Syed Kazim Shah. (2023). Exploring The Social Context of Online English Language Teaching (ELT) Platforms: A Critical Discourse Analysis of YouTube Comments. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 283–293A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/331
  34. Richardson, L., & Lacroix, G. (2023). Which modality results in superior recall for students: Handwriting, typing, or drawing?. Journal of Writing Research, 15(3), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.15.03.04
  35. Sarwar, N., Khurram, F., & Fayyaz, sana. (2023). Impact of Practicing Gratitude on Focus and Resilience in Classroom Learning among University Students: A Qualitative Analysis. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 65–73. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/294
  36. Saville‐Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly, 18(2), 199-219.
  37. Solati-Dehkordi, S. A., &Salehi, H. (2016).Impact of explicit vocabulary instruction on writing achievement of upper-intermediate EFL learners. International Education Studies, 9(4), 141-154.
  38. Shahzaib, & Datoo, A. K. (2023). Pedagogical Utility of Funds of Knowledge for Education for Pluralism: A Case Exploring Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 25–36A. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/338
  39. Syed Khuram Shahzad, Samina Sarwat, & Shamsa Kanwal. (2023). Use Of Semantic and Clustering Methods: for Teaching English Vocabulary At Elementary Level. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 74–84. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/302
  40. Syed Khuram Shahzad, Samina Sarwat, & Ishrat Ramzan. (2023). Examining the Relationship between Empathy and English Language Proficiency in BS English Students at KFUEIT. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(3), 30–40. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/176
  41. Tahira Asgher, Muhammad Saleem, & Dr. Asma Kashif Shahzad. (2023). Eco Linguistics-Infused Procedural Text Learning for ESL Students’ Success. International "Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 3(4), 01–12. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/337
  42. Thompson, A. S. (2024). Introduction to the special issue on languages other than English: A reality check and a glimmer of hope. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.42366
  43. Tong, X., Yu, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Syntactic Skills and Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Investigation. Review of Educational Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241228185
  44. Usman, K., Asnawi, M., & Faisal, M. (2020). Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the learning by teaching technique among university-level English as a foreign language student. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 69-79.
  45. Van Orman, D. S. J., Gotch, C. M., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2024). Preparing Teacher Candidates to Assess for Learning: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241233015
  46. VásconezVásconez, S. P. (2023). Game-based learning writing skill strategies and the writing skill (Master's thesis).
  47. Walinski, C. J., Ontiveros, J. C., Liu, F., Crain, G., & Vardar-Sengul, S. (2023). Optimizing teaching effectiveness in dental education for a new generation of learners. Journal of Dental Education, 87(2), 182-188.
  48. Wong, K. M., &Neuman, S. B. (2019). Learning vocabulary on screen: A content analysis of pedagogical supports in educational media programs for dual-language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(1), 54-72.
  49. Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., &Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on international students in higher education: Generative AI, chatbots, analytics, and international student success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6716.
  50. Watkins, A. (2013). Teacher perceptions of the impact of differentiated instruction and formative assessments in improving academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix).
  51. Willis, J. (2008). Teaching the brain to read: Strategies for improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. ASCD.